References

The following bibliography is list of references used in this site.

• Baddeley, A.J., Gundersen, H.J., Cruz-Orive, L.M. (1986). Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc, Jun;142(Pt 3), 259-76.
• Cruz-Orive, L.M., Garcia-Finana, M. (2005). A review of the article: Comments on the shortcomings of predicting the precision of Cavalieri volume estimates based upon assumed measurement functions, by Edmund Glaser. J Microsc, 218, 6-8.
• Dorph-Petersen, K.A. (1999). Stereological estimation using vertical sections in a complex tissue. Microsc. Jul;195(Pt 1), 79-86.
• Garcia-Finana, M., Cruz-Orive, L.M., Mackay, C.E., Pakkenberg, B., Roberts, N. (2003). Comparison of MR imaging against physical sectioning to estimate the volume of human cerebral compartments. Neuroimage. Feb;18(2), 505-16.
• Geinisman, Y., Gundersen, H.J., van der Zee, E., West, M.J. (1996). Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of synapses in a brain region. J Neurocytol. Dec;25(12), 805-19.
• Geiser, M., Cruz-Orive, L.M., Im Hof, V., Gehr, P. (1990). Assessment of particle retention and clearance in the intrapulmonary conducting airways of hamster lungs with the fractionator. J Microsc. Oct;160(Pt 1), 75-88.
• Glaser, E. (2005).Comments on the shortcomings of predicting the precision of Cavalieri volume estimates based upon assumed measurement functions. J Microsc. Apr;218(Pt 1), 1-5; discussion 6-8.
• Glaser, E.M., Wilson, P.D. (1998). The coefficient of error of optical fractionator population size estimates: a computer simulation comparing three estimators. J Microsc Nov;192(Pt 2) , 163-71.
• Glaser, E.M., Wilson, P.D. (1999). A comparison of three estimators of the coefficient of error of optical fractionator cell count estimates. Acta Stereol 18, 15-25.
• Gundersen, H.J., Bagger, P., Bendtsen, T.F., Evans, S.M., Korbo, L., Marcussen, N., Moller, A., Nielsen, K., Nyengaard, J.R., Pakkenberg, B., et al. ( 1988) The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS. Oct;96(10), 857-81. Review.
• Gundersen, H.J. (1986). Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc. Jul;143(Pt 1), 3-45.
• Gundersen, H.J. (2002) The smooth fractionator.J Microsc. Sep;207(Pt 3), 191-210.
• Gundersen, H.J., Jensen, E.B., Kieu, K., Nielsen, J. (1999). The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology–reconsidered. J Microsc. Mar;193(Pt 3), 199-211.
• Gundersen, H.J. (1998). The nucleator. J Microsc. Jul;151(Pt 1), 3-21.
• Gundersen, H.J.G., “Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary particles: the edge effect,” J Microsc,1977;111:219-223.
• Howard, V., Reid, S., Baddeley, A., Boyde, A. (1985). Unbiased estimation of particle density in the tandem scanning reflected light microscope. J Microsc. May;138(Pt 2), 203-12.
• Jensen, E.B.V. (1988) Local Stereology, World Scientific Publishing Company.
• Larsen ,J.O. (1998). Stereology of nerve cross sections. J Neurosci Methods. Nov 1;85(1), 107-18.
• Mattfeldt, T. (1989). The accuracy of one-dimensional systematic sampling. J. Microsc. 153, 301-313.
• Nyengaard, J.R. (1999). Stereologic methods and their application in kidney research. J Am Soc Nephrol. May;10(5), 1100-23. Review.
• Roberts, N., Garden, A.S., Cruz-Orive, L.M., Whitehouse, G.H., Edwards, R.H. (1994). Estimation of fetal volume by magnetic resonance imaging and stereology. Br J Radiol. Nov;67(803), 1067-77.
• Scheaffer, H,L,. Mendenhall, W., Ott L. (1996). Elementary Survey Sampling, 5th edition, Boston: PWS-Kent.
• Schmitz, C. (1998). Variation of fractionator estimates and its prediction. Anat Embryol (Berl). Nov;198(5), 371-97.
• Schmitz ,C., Hof, P.R. (2000). Recommendations for straightforward and rigorous methods of counting neurons based on a computer simulation approach. J Chem Neuroanat. Oct;20(1), 93-114.
• Schmitz C., Hof P.R. (2005). Design-based stereology in neuroscience. Neuroscience.130(4), 813-31. Review.
• Slomianka L., West, M.J. (2005). Estimators of the precision of stereological estimates: an example based on the CA1 pyramidal cell layer of rats. Neuroscience. 136(3), 757-67.
• Sterio, D.C. (1984). The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc. May;134(Pt 2), 127-36.
• Tang, Y., Nyengaard, J.R. (1997). A stereological method for estimating the total length and size of myelin fibers in human brain white matter. J Neurosci Methods. May 16;73(2), 193-200.
• Thioulouse J. Royet JP. Ploye H. Houllier F. 1993. Evaluation of the precision of systematic sampling: nugget effect and covariogram modelling. J Microsc 172, 249-256.
• West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJ. 1991. Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator.Anat Rec. Dec;231(4), 482-97.
• West MJ. 1993. New stereological methods for counting neurons. Neurobiol Aging. Jul-Aug;14(4), 275-85. Review
• West MJ. 2002. Design-based stereological methods for counting neurons. Prog Brain Res. 135, 43-51. Review.

Sponsored by MBF Bioscience developers of Stereo Investigator, the world’s most cited stereology system